So even according to R' Elyashiv's psak, we have a kol d'parish mei'ruba parish on all Indian hair sheitels, and they should all be permitted. The din of "kol d'parish mei'ruba parish" does not apply to tikroives a"z.
only a sofek tikroves In what sense? Whether it is ta"z is a question of psak and not of doubt about its origin.
Or you mean it is like a kois that fell into a storehouse of identical koisois and then one of them fell into two? That also does not seem to apply here, since in our case the amount of hair is such that we could say for sure that some of it has made it into some wigs. (I.e. the amount of hair discarded is less than the amount of original ta"z hair).
I meant the following: the sofek about psak and the question about rov are of different nature, and, according to my understanding, could not be applied on top of one another to form sfek sfeika.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Еще о париках
Date: 2004-05-22 09:48 pm (UTC)Also you may want to check out the following:
1. After hashgocho on wigs, expect hashgocho on shampoos...
2. Important info regarding the sheitel tumult
Re: Еще о париках
Date: 2004-05-22 10:12 pm (UTC)So even according to R' Elyashiv's psak, we have a kol d'parish mei'ruba parish on all Indian hair sheitels, and they should all be permitted.
The din of "kol d'parish mei'ruba parish" does not apply to tikroives a"z.
Re: Еще о париках
Date: 2004-05-22 10:32 pm (UTC)What you get is a sofek sfeika.
sfek sfeika
Date: 2004-05-22 11:11 pm (UTC)In what sense? Whether it is ta"z is a question of psak and not of doubt about its origin.
Or you mean it is like a kois that fell into a storehouse of identical koisois and then one of them fell into two? That also does not seem to apply here, since in our case the amount of hair is such that we could say for sure that some of it has made it into some wigs. (I.e. the amount of hair discarded is less than the amount of original ta"z hair).
Re: sfek sfeika
Date: 2004-05-23 01:22 am (UTC)Re: sfek sfeika
Date: 2004-05-23 01:48 am (UTC)I meant the following: the sofek about psak and the question about rov are of different nature, and, according to my understanding, could not be applied on top of one another to form sfek sfeika.